Requests for admission are used to ask another party to admit that certain facts are true, or that certain documents are authentic. If admitted as true or authentic, these facts and documents do not need to be proven or authenticated at trial. This helps reduce the number of disputed facts that the court needs to decide in the case, making trials quicker and less expensive.
The requests for admission that you receive will include a list of statements or facts that the other party wishes you to admit are true. Your answers must be as complete and straightforward as possible (California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) § 2033.220), and be accurate to the best of your knowledge. You must sign under penalty of perjury that your responses are true and correct (CCP § 2033.240).
You may also need…
Step-by-Step Guides on Responding to Discovery
Step-by-Step Guides on Making Discovery Requests
Other Guides on Discovery
Related Videos
You have 30 days from the date the requests were served to you (35 if served by mail within California) to serve your responses to the requests for admission.
Whether the asking party used the Judicial Council form, Request for Admissions (DISC-020), or created their own request on pleading paper, the request will contain a numbered list of facts that you are being asked to admit, and/or a numbered list of documents, which are then also attached, that you are being asked to admit are genuine. You will need to respond to each of the numbered statements.
There are three basic responses to a request for admission:
Admit. With this answer, you are indicating that the fact is true. If part of a statement is true, you must admit that portion of the statement. Once you admit a fact, it will be considered true throughout the entirety of the case. These facts can only be overturned by filing a complicated motion with the court.
Deny. With this answer, you are indicating that the fact is not true. This may mean that the entire statement is untrue, or that portions are untrue. If the statement is partially true, you must admit the true part(s) of the fact and deny the false part(s) of the fact (CCP § 2033.220(b)(1) & (2)). For example, if the propounding party asks, “Admit that the accident you were involved in on May 4, 2013, was caused by your negligence,” you could admit that you were involved in an accident on that date, but deny that it was caused by your negligence.
If you deny the truthfulness of a fact, the other party will need to prove that fact at trial. DO NOT deny all the requests just to make the other party prove every fact. If you are found to have improperly denied a request, the court may order you to pay all attorney’s fees and costs incurred by the other party to prove the fact at trial (CCP § 2033.420(a)). Additionally, if you purposely deny a fact you know to be true, you are committing perjury and opening yourself to possible criminal charges!
Cannot truthfully admit or deny the matters set forth in this request because (s)he does not have knowledge of these matters, and despite reasonable inquiry into the matter by reviewing all of the records and information available to him, to obtain information from which the truth or falsity of the matter might be learned. This is a legalese way of stating that you do not know if the fact is true, and that after carefully reviewing all the evidence available to you, you cannot determine if the fact is true or false. You are required to perform a reasonable investigation of the evidence available to you before making this response (CCP § 2033.220(c)). If you do not, the requesting party may file a motion to have the facts deemed admitted by the court, or a motion to compel further responses, both of which may carry sanctions (monetary penalties) against you. If your failure to investigate results in the fact needing to be proven at trial, the court may order you to pay all attorney’s fees and costs incurred by the other party to prove the fact at trial (CCP § 2033.420(a)).
Sometimes, rather than admitting or denying the truthfulness of a fact, you may object to the request on legal grounds. Common objections to requests for admission include:
The request is impermissibly compound. The propounding party may ask you to admit only one fact per statement. You may object to any request that asks you to admit two or more different facts in a single request. For example, “Admit that you are the owner of a Toyota Corolla with the license plate 7ABC123, and that you were driving it on Highway 50 at 4pm on May 4, 2013,” is impermissibly compound. It is asking you to admit two separate facts: that you own the vehicle, and that you were driving it at the specified time.
The request is vague, ambiguous or unintelligible. Sometimes, it is impossible to determine what the propounding party is asking you to admit. In these situations, you may object to the request on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous or unintelligible. For example, if the propounding party asks, “Admit you were there,” you may want to object to the request on these grounds. This request is vague, as it does not provide any specifics about the date or location where they wish you to admit you were.
The request is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of relevant, admissible evidence. All requests for admission must be relevant to the issues in the case. If a request does not lead to the discovery of relevant, admissible evidence, you may object. For example, in a car accident case, if the propounding party asks: “Admit that you were wearing purple socks at the time of the accident,” you may want to object to the request. Unless the color of your socks is related to the accident, this request is not likely to lead to relevant evidence in the case.
If only a portion of the request is objectionable, the non-objectionable portion of the request must be answered (CCP § 2033.230(a)). There are many other objections that may be raised in your responses to requests for admission. See the resources listed at the end of this Guide for more information.